Supreme Court Punts on Janet Jackson Breast Case

WASHINGTON — In a minor victory for the FCC over broadcast networks, the U.S. Supreme Court punted on the case involving Janet Jackson's breast at the Super Bowl.

The case is formally known as FCC v. CBS Corp., 08-653. CBS broadcast the 2004 Super Bowl, which featured Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake at halftime. During their performance, Timberlake tore off part of Jackson's top, revealing one of her breasts, which bore a sun-shaped ornament on the nipple.

The incident sparked outrage from conservative groups, who complained about nudity during a family-oriented national broadcast. The FCC fined CBS $550,000 for the offense, which the network has been fighting in court ever since.

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia struck down the fine, and although the Supreme Court didn't overturn that ruling, they did ask that lower court to reconsider its position. Last week, the Supreme Court also aligned itself with the FCC, giving its OK for the federal agency to hold the threat of fines over the heads of networks that let even a single swear word through its censors.

At odds in the lower court's decision was the idea of what constitutes "shocking." According to precedent, something would only be shocking if it was "so pervasive as to amount to 'shock treatment' for the audience." A lower appellate court hit CBS with the $550,000 fine despite this standard, even though Jackson's naked breast was only on air for less than a second.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Sansyl Group Acquires Blue Donkey Media

Sansyl Group, parent company of AdultPrime Network, has acquired Blue Donkey Media B.V., owner of Dutch adult site Meiden van Holland, among several other erotic websites and television channels.

Pineapple Support to Hold Mental Health Summit

The annual Pineapple Support Mental Health Summit is taking place Dec. 15-17.

Ofcom Fines AVS Group $1.3 Million for AV Noncompliance

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Wednesday imposed a penalty of one million pounds, or approximately $1.3 million, on AVS Group Ltd. after an investigation concluded that the company had failed to implement robust age checks on 18 adult websites.

Updated: Aylo to Help Test EU Age Verification App

Pornhub parent company Aylo plans to participate in the European Commission’s pilot program for its “white label” age verification app, a spokesperson for the company has confirmed.

Missouri Lawmaker Attempts to Revive 'Health Warnings' for Adult Sites

A Missouri state representative has introduced a bill that would require adult sites to post notices warning users of alleged physical, mental, and social harms associated with pornography, despite a previous federal court ruling against such requirements.

New Age Verification Service 'BorderAge' Launches

French startup company Needemand has officially launched its subscription-based age verification solution, BorderAge.

Ruling: Italy's 'Porn Tax' Applies to All Content Creators

Italy’s tax revenue agency has ruled that the nation’s 25% “ethical tax” on income generated from adult content applies even to smaller independent online content creators.

Proposed New Hampshire AV Bill Appears to Violate Constitution

A bill in the New Hampshire state legislature, aimed at requiring adult sites to age-verify users in that state, contains a provision that seemingly contradicts the Supremacy Clause in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution.

AEBN Publishes Report on Fetish Trends

AEBN has published a report on fetish categories from its straight and gay theaters.

Online Child Protection Hearing to Include Federal AV Bill

A House subcommittee will hold a hearing next week on a slate of bills aimed at protecting minors online, including the SCREEN Act, which would make site-based age verification of users seeking to access adult content federal law.

Show More